Dear friends,
The terrorists have defined the game and we are reacting. They
are clever, patient and creative. They planned their attacks for
months and executed them with great effectiveness. They are
not stupid, so they have made plans for the expected American military
response. An attack on Afghanistan is exactly what the terrorists
want. It will strengthen and swell their small but fanatical ranks.
What better opportunity to destabilize Pakistan, foment a coup and establish
another Islamic fundamentalist state. Imagine several divisions of
US troops as hostages in an Islamic state which holds nuclear weapons!
Instead, bomb Afghanistan with butter, with rice, bread, clothing and medicine. It will cost less than conventional arms, poses no threat of US casualties and just might get the Afghan populace thinking that the Taliban leaders don't have the answers. After years of drought and with starvation looming, let's offer the Afghani people the vision of a new future. One that includes full stomachs.
Barrage them with information; video players and cassettes of world leaders, particularly Islamic leaders, condemning terrorism. Carpet the country with magazines and newspapers showing the horror of the acts committed by their "guest". Blitz them with laptop computers and DVD players filled with a perspective that is denied them by their government. Saturation bombing with truth will mean that some of it gets through. Send so much that the Taliban can't collect and hide it all.
The Taliban are telling their people to prepare for Jihad. In response, let's give the Afghani people their first good meal in years. Seeing your family fully fed and the prospect of a stable future is a powerful deterrent to martyrdom. All we ask in return is that they, as a people, agree to enter the civilized world. That includes allowing international law to run its course. Let's offer them a helping hand into the 21st century.
In responding to terrorism we need to do something different.. something totally unexpected..something that addresses the root of the problem instead of exacerbating it. We need to be wiser and more clever than the terrorists. We need to define the contest on our terms, not theirs. We need to take away the well of despair, ignorance and brutality from which the Osama bin Laden's of the world water their gardens of terror.
We have the technology... do we have the compassion?
Kent Madin Ulaan Baatar Mongolia rett39@hotmail.com
Some comments against these idea and my response:
>From: "Susan G" <email suppressed>
>To: <rett39@hotmail.com>
>Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:41:05 -0400
>
"In response to your idea... what planet do you live on?
Is New York City in the country you live in. Is Washington your Capitol?
Or do you live somewhere else? Maybe you live on the planet called
"Unrealistic Idealism" that hasn't been identified yet. Innocent
CIVILIANS are dead. People just like you and me are dead! These
terrorists are not and never will be civilized. The terrorists and
the members of their networks will not feel any differently about US citizens,
Jews, and Christians because of our outpouring of rice, bread, I Can't
Believe It's Not Butter, DVD's and home computers. They hate us,
do you understand that. They think we all should die. They
are not reasonable people that can be reasoned with. It is really
heard to believe but it is very true and very real. This is the world
we now live in. Unrealistic solutions of "let's bomb them with good
intentions" is what has gotten us in this mess in the first place.
>Our prayers should all be with the good Muslim people in the Middle
East that have been fighting for the pure principals of Islam. But
this is for their good too, maybe someday they can be free like us.
This is the most necessary fight we as a civilized society have ever undertaken,
it is an unsure future for all of us. But in it's purest form this
is a struggle between good and evil, right and wrong. It must be
done this way. There are no and should not be any alternatives."
Dear Susan,
Is every Afghani a terrorist and therefore evil? Have you considered
that
whoever did this didn't stop planning with the horrific events of Sept
11? Is
it not likely this is just a way to bring the enraged bear (or eagle)
out where
it is vulnerable? Our government is reacting exactly the way
they want us to
react. THEY are defining the game board, and we are walking right
into it. My
point in my piece is not that I have some "pie in the sky" idealism
about
feeding hungry people and making the world a happy place. When
you get things
for free, they are like drugs: addictive, not constructive. But
to a starving
people the offer of help can be a more effective political and social
lever than
the threat of war and death. My writing comes from a pragmatism
about warfare
and a cynicism about politics. What does our enemy want and need
from us? The
want and need us to act just the way they have depicted us to their
Muslim
brethren. They need us to reinforce the false notion of America
as the Great
Satan, complete with overbearing military might. If we do that
we play into
their hands.
Sure, we aren't going to really bomb them with butter and DVD's.
But we need to
be smarter and more creative than they are. Most importantly
we need to do
something unexpected, out of the box. We need to be the ones who create
the
playing field on OUR terms. How about offering to feed and shelter
every
Afghani who wants to leave Afghanistan in the next 5 days? Tell
the Pakistani's
and the Uzbeks to open their borders and we will pick up the tab for
the food
and shelter (still cheaper than war). THEN go in and strike the
Taliban if
necessary and support the reinstatement of the Afghani government that
is
recognized by all but three nations in the world.
Are you confident in the military regime in Pakistan being able to withstand
the
street riots and potential coup that may well arise if we use Pakistan
to attack
Afghanistan? Has it occured to you that as long as the terrorists
have been
planning what they did on September 11, they may also have been planning
for a
coup in Pakistan?
Do you want to live in a country like Israel, where security is a numbing
constant of life? And what security? So we keep them off
the commercial
planes, what's to keep a suicide bomber out of the grade school that
your kids
attend? What's to keep a suicide pilot with a Cessna full of
explosives from
flying into a nuclear power plant? Sure, we may get Osama bin
Laden and lots of
his buddies and we may roll up much of the terrorist "cells" but if
we don't do
something about the conditions that foster that kind of fanaticism
it will never
go away, it will only get more ugly. And if we meet that terror
with terror it
will make us more ugly. We will look in the mirror and see the
visage of our
enemy.
Military action may make us feel good for a while, but it will sow the
seeds of
a cycle of terror of which we have only had a hint. On September
11 our concept of
security changed forever. Off the shelf technology has turned
anyone willing to
die into a weapon of mass destruction.
Kent Madin
I am not a pacifist. Please do not use what I wrote to promote a totally non-violent point of view. I would gladly push the button to give the bin Ladens and the Talibans of the world first class ticket to Paradise, courtesy of the USAF. My purpose in writing the piece was to illustrate the need to respond to a new paradigm with new thinking. Bombing with butter seemed like that absolute last thing that anyone would ever have expected. And I think just doing something unexpected helps us regain control of the agenda. The fact that feeding people is a good thing reinforces that effectiveness of doing something "out of the box".
Links to more articles that I think everyone should read.
http://slate.msn.com/Earthling/01-09-17/Earthling.asp
http://slate.msn.com/Earthling/01-09-19/Earthling.asp
"War" is an inaccurate way to describe what we face.
I think that a public health model is more
accurate. We have seen an outbreak, an epidemic, of a disease
called terrorism. It is especially awful because it has mutated to
include spectacular attacks on civilian targets. It should be looked
at like a disease. 1. The germs of this disease are endemic to all
societies. 2. We can vaccinate with education. 3. We owe it to ourselves
and our health concerns to take action that reduces the likelihood of an
outbreak. That, like response to many diseases, may mean a change
in our lifestyle. 4. We need to identify the conditions which allow this
disease to reproduce and thrive and we need to spend our money in efforts
to mitigate those conditions.
Finally, following along with that disease metaphor, I think I heard
about the first example of America's intuitive "anti-virus" response.
On a flight last weekend the captain's message was:
"Folks, we have checked this plane with a fine tooth comb and I can
assure you there is no bomb aboard. If someone stands up and claims
he is going to hijack this plane, you all just jump on him
and hold him down. These are tough times and we are all in
this together. For the duration of this flight at least, we have
to rely on each other. Now, before we take off, turn to the
person in the seat next to you and introduce yourself. Thanks for
choosing Delta airlines."
The first casualties have already been bagged and the fact they were
civilian makes us all combatants. Demonstrating our "Americanness"
to each other, in the mundane and ephemeral community of an flight departing
Denver, is our best defense against terrorism.